The request for admission shall not exceed 30 requests, including all subparts, unless the court permits a larger number on motion and notice and for good cause, or the parties propounding and responding to the requests stipulate to a larger number. Without leave of court the request may be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the process and initial pleading upon that party. The statement that objection may be made to any request, which is improper adds nothing to the provisions that the party serve an answer or objection addressed to each matter and that he state his reasons for any objection. WebFlorida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370 governs requests for admissions. requests, including all subparts, unless the court permits a larger number on motion Rule 1.370 Requests For Admission - Florida Rules Of Civil Request for Admissions requested shall be separately set forth. %%EOF
Study Abroad Options | National Louis University | Chicago, The existing language describing the available grounds for objection to a request for admission is eliminated as neither necessary nor helpful. Objection: The requesting party has exceeded the numerical limit imposed by Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.030(b). WebDEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Plaintiff is requested to admit or deny the following allegations pursuant to the appropriate Florida Rule of Civil Procedures: 1. Nevertheless, this rule is not designed to shift fees and costs to the recipient simply because the party does not stipulate to a contested fact. Study Abroad Options | National Louis University | Chicago, Find application options and info for all Florida programs. Unless the court determines that an objection is justified, it shall order that an answer be served. required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 45 days after homestead exemption Opinion filed April 7, 2021. 6 The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Section A party may serve on any other party a written request to admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1) relating to: (A) facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; and. WebIN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION FIRSTSECOND CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, vs. JANE DOE, Defendant. The major changes are as follows: (1) The normal time for response to a request for admissions is lengthened from 10 to 30 days, conforming more closely to prevailing practice. obtainable by that party is insufficient to enable that party to admit or deny. 6, Issue You did not notify Mr. The language of Rule 36 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Civil Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. 276 (D.Nebr. Courts have also divided on whether an answering party may properly object to request for admission as to matters which that party regards as in dispute. Compare, e.g., Syracuse Broadcasting Corp. v. Newhouse, 271 F.2d 910, 917 (2d Cir. 473 (E.D.Pa. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest. Request for Admissions The sanction for failure of a party to inform himself before he answers lies in the award of costs after trial, as provided in Rule 37(c). Subdivision (a). With more than 300 degree options from 16 academic colleges, Florida is the place to forge your future. University of Florida Request For Admissions Rule 26(d) is now familiar, obviating any need to carry forward the redundant cross-reference. Effect of an Admission; Withdrawing or Amending It. E.g., Hise v. Lockwood Grader Corp., 153 F.Supp. The court shall issue such an order at the time a party requesting the admissions proves the genuineness of the document or the truth of the matter, upon motion by the requesting party, unless it finds that (1) the request was held objectionable pursuant torule 1.370(a), (2)the admission sought was of no substantial importance, or (3) there was other good reason for the failure to admit. Field & McKusick, Maine Civil Practice 36.4 (1959); Finman, supra, 71 Yale L.J. 10: (As amended Dec. 27, 1946, eff. Dr. Castles response that he has no evidence to dispute that Megan Cotton was Lawrence Cottons wife tells the Court that Dr. Castle has no good faith basis to deny the request. as is pleading upon that party. 231, 69; Mich.Court Rules Ann. 1961); United States v. Ehbauer, 13 F.R.D. Florida courts prefer allowing the tardy party to serve responses rather than deem all of their answers admitted despite their inaction. These should be served with 1.370(a).) The party runs no risk of sanctions if the matter is genuinely in issue, since Rule 37(c) provides a sanction of costs only when there are no good reasons for a failure to admit. 110, 182 and Rule 18 (Ill.Rev.Stat. The rule of this case is now clearly stated. Thus, by operation of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Section 1.370(a), the matters we addressed in the RFAs should be deemed admitted.. 371 (1962). Your subscription was successfully upgraded. 8 WebUS Legal Forms Requests for Admissions Request For Admissions Sample The Forms Professionals Trust! In Florida, there is a liberal standard when it comes to discovery and the discovery process. A party who considers that a matter of which an admission has been requested Rule 36 Requests for Admission Complete all sections of the application. Learn about nationally acclaimed undergraduate and graduate programs, including online admissions instructions. WebMd. Your content views addon has successfully been added. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Middle District of Florida, and existing requests for admissions, and responses to requests for admissions shall not be filed with the Court as a matter of course. See the Office of Admissions for undergrad-focused tours and much more. See, e.g., Syracuse Broadcasting Corp. v. Newhouse, supra. means test 1938), and by analogy an admission made pursuant to Rule 36 may likewise be thought rebuttable. (3) The requirement that the objecting party move automatically for a hearing on his objection is eliminated, and the burden is on the requesting party to move for an order. Florida courts favor allowing amendments to permit a disposition on the merits, rather than on technical admissions. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. (2 Cum.Supp. 1952). These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Web2. Each matter must be separately stated. 1.370(a).) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Shelton - Carlton Fields 462 (W.D.Mo. (B) the genuineness of any described documents. Derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 as amended in 1970. 890 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<6BFB054BF7903F4298B45799B95D41A1>]/Index[879 23]/Info 878 0 R/Length 73/Prev 296709/Root 880 0 R/Size 902/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
hb```~fe &@EV0c{mC~,7;X d$#k\F\A?L\ZM.^55, hhxd"
S}dw|GCCCcsJ444u4 Y,
F | Fe`3up: ^: d#0X;I g XZB1 /iY
Admissions R. Civ . A request to admit the genuineness of a document must be accompanied by a copy of the document unless it is, or has been, otherwise furnished or made available for inspection and copying. The party who has requested the admissions may move to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections. (1937) 322, 323; Wis.Stat. v. Shelton (2017) 223 So. WebThe request for admission shall not exceed 30 requests, including all subparts, unless the court permits a larger number on motion and notice and for good cause, or the parties document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); 5220 Hood Road, STE 200 You will lose the information in your envelope, MOTION REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION REGENCY CENTERS LP AND EQUITY ONE ( FLO, SCOTT, ROY W V REGENCY CENTERS CORPORATION, MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AWARD OF EXPENSES FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO , PETROVITCH, MARIA V UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, URBAITIS, LORI V STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONSE TO: PLT'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DFT'S RESPONSE T, FORER, JUSTIN V MS JASMINE PROPERTIES LLC, RESPONSE TO: IN OPPOSITION TO PLT'S MOTION TO DEEM REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS , MCMAHON, FRANCIS ALOYISIUS V BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, Motion to Allow/Strike Late Expert Witness Submission, [DOCUMENT] OSCAT ENTERPRISES INC V FORTRESS CAPITAL NOTE AQUISITION LLC, [DOCUMENT] MORRISON, LANDON V LYNCH, DOROTHY BARTON, [DOCUMENT] Linda Welch Plaintiff vs. Erica Jones Defendant, [DOCUMENT] Ramgoh Home Sales Inc, et al Plaintiff vs. Michael Vitale Defendant, [DOCUMENT] WANDA COWART VS UNITED PROPERT. Since it is not always easy to know whether a denial is specific or an explanation is in detail, neither party can know how the court will rule at trial and whether proof must be prepared. Admissions In most cases, both attorneys will file an agreed order to enlarge time for the tardy lawyer to file a response to the other partys discovery requests. _____ No. A party must not object solely on the ground that the request presents a genuine issue for trial. The court may lengthen or shorten the time when special situations require it. Rule 36 serves two vital purposes, both of which are designed to reduce trial time. If objection is made, the reasons shall be stated. A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement the response to include information thereafter acquired. Request for Admissions Child Support Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 1957). Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. 1957); E. H. Tate Co. v. Jiffy Enterprises, Inc., 16 F.R.D. Deny. DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS WebUSE THE REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION BELOW IF YOU ARE THE DEFENDANT REQUEST NUMBER 1 Admit that YOU have no evidence that the propounding party is responsible for YOUR damages. moratorium 879 0 obj
<>
endobj
The redundant reminder of Rule 37(c) in the second paragraph was likewise omitted. tenant Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1993 Amendment. 104 (S.D.Iowa 1954). made, the reasons shall be stated. Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 We served our initial RFAs to opposing counsel on October 1, 2013. Most simply, a request for admission is a discovery tool, in which one party, or both parties, attempt to establish issues that do not go to the heart of the case. This document requests that the other party admit or deny certain issues pertaining to the matter at hand. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1946 Amendment. D09348 - Respondents' Responses to Complaint Counsel's with the requirements of this rule, it may order either that the matter is 5 As to opinion, compare, e.g., Jackson Bluff Corp. v. Marcelle, 20 F.R.D. closings homestead Under this rule, if a recipient denies a request for admission and the requester proves the truth of the matter, the requester is entitled to expenses inclusive of attorneys fees. Dec. 1, 2007. In addition, [w]hile it is normally within the trial court's discretion to use a technically deemed admission to support a summary judgment, it is error if the record contains evidence to the contrary of the admission. (In re Forfeiture of 1982 Ford Mustang, Vehicle ID No. If a matter is not admitted, the answer must specifically deny it or state in detail why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny it. However, most parties will specify that the responses to the RFAs are due 20 days from the date of the agreed order. 1961). Students from Universidad del Valle de Mxico will be provided with the opportunity to enroll at Kendall College at NLU as full-time students for 2 academic quarters pursuing culinary management or hospitality management curriculum. prevailing party hbbd```b``!d [EA$wX,H2-d`bd`LgW
Requests may require the responding party to admit the genuineness of documents, or the truth of specified matters of fact, opinion relating to fact, or application of law to fact. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to w/og n#A_/&"D8GSDdXp~t8U}KEcG)S=-W5S0oydw3Z=b+;F^EYTBSpBNDV%~. 10 REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.370 Below are two cases that deem answers admitted for failure to either serve responses to RFAs or attempts at serving responses months after the initial request. Report Discrimination, Harassment or Misconduct. On the other hand, requests to admit may be so voluminous and so framed that the answering party finds the task of identifying what is in dispute and what is not unduly burdensome. Burdensome and oppressive. 1957); California v. The S.S. Jules Fribourg, 19 F.R.D. and upon any other party with or after service of the process and initial 561-473-4754, 130 S Indian River Dr #217 The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. coronavirus WebRESPONDENTS' RESPONSES TO COMPLAIT COUNSEL'S FmST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS Respondents Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. and Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. ("Respondents") respond and object to Complaint Counsel's Request for Admissions ("Requests") as set forth below. endstream
endobj
880 0 obj
<. The requesting party may move to determine the sufficiency of an answer or objection. The total number of requests for admission that may be served without leave of court is limited to 30, including all subparts. truthfully admit or deny the matter. endstream
endobj
startxref
On the other hand, the court should not automatically defer decision; in many instances, the importance of the admission lies in enabling the requesting party to avoid the burdensome accumulation of proof prior to the pretrial conference. Unless the party securing an admission can depend on its binding effect, he cannot safely avoid the expense of preparing to prove the very matters on which he has secured the admission, and the purpose of the rule is defeated. See generally Finman, The Request for Admissions in Federal Civil Procedure, 71 Yale L.J. I have recently encountered a Personal Injury Protection (PIP) insurance benefits case in which opposing counsel has failed to respond to our RFAs. The rule provides that if a party fails to respond to a request for admissions within thirty days of service of the request, the matter is deemed admitted. The broadening of the rule to encompass mixed questions of law and fact reinforces this feature. Corp., 24 F.R.D. (2) The present requirement that the plaintiff wait 10 days to serve requests without leave of court is eliminated. 686 (W.D.Ark. The requirement that the answer to a request for admission be sworn is deleted, in favor of a provision that the answer be signed by the party or by his attorney. 786-886-1550. img class="statcounter" src="https://c.statcounter.com/7339167/0/39bea60f/1/" alt="site stats">. (4) A problem peculiar to Rule 36 arises if the responding party serves answers that are not in conformity with the requirements of the rulefor example, a denial is not specific, or the explanation of inability to admit or deny is not in detail. Rule 36 now makes no provision for court scrutiny of such answers before trial, and it seems to contemplate that defective answers bring about admissions just as effectively as if no answer had been served. by Leif from Orlando, Florida, Orange County. At least in some jurisdictions a party may rebut his own testimony, e.g., Alamo v. Del Rosario, 98 F.2d 328 (D.C.Cir. The corporation practiced no diligence in moving forward to file belated answers. a Request for Admission WebREQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS 1. They have at times ordered that amended answers be served, when the defects were technical, and at other times have declared that the matter was admitted. property appraiser Chapter 7 (a) Request for Admission. srq magazine Think Florida is right for you? Power is therefore expressly conferred upon the court to defer decision until a pretrial conference is held or until a designated time prior to trial. 772-519-7794, 7340 SW 90th Street Without leave of court WebUnder Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.370 provides that when a trial court determines that an answer does not comply with the requirements of the rule, the court may order either that the matter is admitted or that an amended answer be served. (Chelminsky v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (2016) 184 So. The changes in clause (1) are merely of a clarifying and conforming nature. title insurance. Florida Attorney General Admissions If the county court judge agrees with our position, an appeal is most likely to follow. 628, 636637 (E.D.Pa. A particular problem for pro se litigants are requests for admissions because of the provision in FRCP Rule 1.370(a) that matters not timely denied are deemed admitted. The rule provides that if a party fails to respond to a request for admissions within thirty days of service of Practice Pointers for Administrative Hearings 30, 1970, eff. WebOnline & Distance Learning. service of the process and initial pleading upon the defendant. Request for Admissions - Do I have to file with the clerk or can 1.370(b).) Rule 1.370(b) goes on to provide: Effect of Admission. Thus, when a party admits in part and denies in part, his admission is for purposes of the pending action only and may not be used against him in any other proceeding. I Sued the Wrong Party and Need to Amend the Complaint AFTER the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations, Declaratory Judgment / Relief Considerations, Affidavit Used to Support or Defend Against Summary Judgment, Calculating the Judgment Obtained in Determining Proposals for Settlement, Establishing Punitive Damages Against a Corporation, Premise Liability Claims and Case Example of Slip on Uneven Floors, Discussion on the Difference Between Replacement Cost Value and Fair Market Value, FINANCIAL DISCOVERY FROM EXPERT WITNESSES TO SHOW BIAS, The Bench Trial and Competent Substantial Evidence, Demonstrating the Difficult Burden in PIERCING the Corporate Veil, Vicarious Liability and the Going and Coming Rule, Courts are not Here to Rewrite Bargained for Contractual Provisions, Civil Theft has a Rigorous Burden of Proof, There can be a Winner for Prevailing Party Attorneys Fees when Both Parties Lose, Moving for a Remittitur to Reduce Jurys Verdict, Appealing a Discovery Order Requiring the Production of Work Product, Non-Signatory Compelling Arbitration based on Equitable Estoppel, Procedure Over Substance when it comes to Temporary Injunction Order, Proposals for Settlements and Attaching Releases, Dismissal due to Fraud on the Court Post-Jury Verdict Not Soooooo Fast, Special Venue Rule in Breach of Contract Actions Known as Debtor-Creditor Rule, Do Not Overlook Reviewing the Forum Selection Provision in the Contract, Expert Cannot Serve as Conduit for Inadmissible Evidence / Hearsay, Florida Supreme Court says No! The matter is admitted unless the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission a written answer or objection addressed to the matter within 30 days after service of the request or such shorter or longer time as the court may allow but, unless the court shortens the time, a defendant shall not be required to serve answers or objections before the expiration of 45 days after service of the process and initial pleading upon the defendant. Requests for Admission genuineness of any documents described in the request. real estate Personal Jurisdiction and Florida Courts Two-Prong Analysis, Yes, Lawsuits are an Inconvenience, but this does NOT Mean You get Inconvenience Damages, Evidentiary Hearing Warranted before Compelling Non-Signatories to Arbitration, Mutual Mistake or Unilateral Mistake in Contract, Employees Premise Liability Claim Barred by Disclaimer / Release in Employment Agreement, Comparative Fault Applies when Substance of the Action is Sounded in Negligence, Work Product Document and Withholding of Documents Based on Doctrine, Nature of Disclosure under Floridas Public Whistleblower Act, Declaratory Relief in Insurance Coverage Dispute, Statute of Limitations Accrual for Breach of Contract, Enforce Settlement Agreement OR Breach of Settlement Agreement, Objecting and/or Refusing to Participate in Employers Activity in Violation of a Law, Rule, or Regulation under Floridas Whistleblower Act, Quick Note: Obtaining a Default Final Judgment, Appealing a Protective Order that Precludes You from Deposing Material Witness, Tortious Interference with Business Relationship and Two Defense Privileges, Possible or Speculative Events do Not Give Rise to Fraudulent Nondisclosure, Prevailing Party in Civil Action Entitled to Recover Costs, Properly Exercising the Right of First Refusal, Reasonable Attorneys Fees Expert when Attorneys Fees are the Damages, Prejudgment Interest for Economic Damages is Predicated on the Loss Theory, Take Advantage of Video Conference Consultations with an Attorney. MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts Rule 1.370: What Admissions are Legal | Fort Myers, P. No preface or instruction shall be included . 248. For example, in a lawsuit about a contract dispute, Party A could ask Party B to admit or deny that Party B ordered 100 widgets from Party A on a given date. lakewood ranch property taxes We will be with you every step of the way as you work to fulfill your dream of a promising future and new career. Earn a Florida degree or certificate from anywhere in the world. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4, Medical Expert Testimony at Social Security Disability Hearings, Social Security Disability Denial: Reconsideration Process, What You Need to Know. . (6) Motion Regarding the Sufficiency of an Answer or Objection. WebPLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE . ABP16F6CF190433 (1998) 725 So.2d 382, 385; see also HSBC Bank USA v. Parodi (2016) 193 So.3d 65, 66 [[I]t is reversible error to involuntarily dismiss an action or grant summary judgment based solely on the failure to timely respond to a request for admissions where the pleadings and/or the record evidence contradicts the technical admissions and no prejudice has been demonstrated.], A trial judge has broad discretion in dealing with requests for admission. The award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion is made subject to the comprehensive provisions of Rule 37(a)(4). If so, the responding party may obtain a protective order under Rule 26(c). Webbe useful to indicate the numbers of the requests covered by the objection. The request for admission may not exceed 30 requests, including all subparts, unless the court permits a larger number on motion and notice and for good Responses to requests Old Republic Certain disagreements in the courts about the proper scope of the rule are resolved. University of Florida P. 504 (E.D.Pa. A shorter or longer time for responding may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered by the court. Letter, Inc. (1982) 413 So.2d 450, 451.) Boca Raton, FL 33487 The party to whom the request is directed shall serve a written response within 30 days after service of the request, except that a defendant may serve a response within 45 days after service of the process and initial pleading on that defendant. Disclaimer: The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure have been reproduced here in their entirety and are being provided as a courtesy and free of charge. The provisions of Rule 36 make it clear that admissions function very much as pleadings do. Earn a Florida degree or certificate from anywhere in the world. Fill in your profile information. See Fla. R. Civ. Legal Request for Admissions: What happens if I fail to respond? Florida College/University Admissions Requirements 139 (E.D.N.Y. 0
Physical and Mental Examinations, Rule 37. The following responses are made FAR/BAR Contract ), Equitable Relief: One seeking Equity MUST do Equity, Exculpatory Clauses will be Strictly Construed to Determine Enforceability, Do Yourself a Favor: Get a Court Reporter at that Impactful Hearing, Real Estate Brokers are NOT Immune from Liability, Res Judicata and 4 Requirements that Must be Demonstrated, Writ of Prohibition to Prevent Trial Court from Exceeding Jurisdiction, Directed Verdict Granted where No View of Evidence Could Support Jury Verdict, Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directing Trial Court to Take Action, Considerations: Independent Tort Doctrine and Claim Known as Equitable Accounting, Waiver is a Voluntary Relinquishment of a Known Right that Must be Proven with a Clear Showing, Dismissal Without Prejudice does NOT Trigger Attorneys Fees under Proposal for Settlements, Bert Harris Act and Competing Motions for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff MUST Confer Direct Benefit on Defendant to Prove Unjust Enrichment, You Cannot Intentionally Render Moot a Plaintiffs Lawsuit, Apparent Authority of Agent to Bind Principal, Serving the Civil Remedy Notice (CRN) to Perfect a First-Party Bad Faith Insurance Claim, Breach of Express Contract is Exception to Sovereign Immunity, Moving for and Challenging a Protective Order under the Apex Doctrine, Purchase-and-Sale Contract: Your Right to Modify Them, Premise Liability and Duty Owed to Business Invitees, Recovering Attorneys Fees in Litigating the Amount of Attorneys Fees, Business Interruption due to COVID-19 NOT Covered under Commercial Property Insurance Policy, Foreseeability and the Duty Element of a Negligence Claim, Post-Judgment Receiver Appointed to Collect on Behalf of Judgment Creditor, Reminder: Not Every Breach is a Material Breach of Contract, Adding a Non-Party Fabre Defendant to the Verdict Form, 3-Step Process for Objections to Trade Secrets, Attorneys Fees to Prevailing Party Under FDUTPA Claim are PERMISSIVE, Contractually Disclaiming a Fraud Claim (Possible, but not Easy to do), Floridas Single Publication Rule (and Defamation Claims), Reasonable Time to Accept Settlement Offer (is a Question of Fact), Contingency Fee Multiplier Must Establish the Relevant Market Factor, Business Judgment Rule Designed to Shield Directors from Personal Liability, Ambiguity in Insurance Policy Interpreted in Favor of Insured, Pure Bill of Discovery NOT for Purposes of Fishing Expedition, Partition Action does Not Result in Money Damages Against a Party, Consider Prevailing Party Attorneys Fees before Voluntarily Dismissing Case, Confession of Judgment does Not Start the Clock to File Motion for Attorneys Fees, Quick Note: Motion for Protective Order Reviewed Under Abuse of Discretion Standard of Review, There are NO Magic Buzz Words to Effectuate an Assignment, Presuit Appraisal Requirement under Bert J. Harris Act, Determining whether Lis Pendens Against Property is Appropriate Fair Nexus, Recovering Attorneys Fees Incurred on Partys Behalf, To Pierce Corporate Veil, there Needs to be Sufficient Findings of Improper Conduct, Timely Moving for Trial De Novo after Non-Binding Arbitration Award, Attorneys Fees do Not have to be Quantified in Proposal for Settlement, A Bad Deal does NOT Make It an Unlawful Deal, Dismissal of Complaint (Action under Floridas Public Whistleblower Act) for Failure to State Cause of Action, Duty Element of Negligence Did Defendants Conduct Foreseeably Create Broader Zone of Risk, Trier of Fact Determines Weight of the Evidence, Oops!